MAC vs Bare Minerals?

I currently use Mac studio fix powder but I was considering switching to bare minerals powder fopundation. Does anyone think this is a wise choice or should I stick with studio fix? Also, I use NC20 for summer and NC15 for winter which are very pale shades, does Bare Minerals cater for such pale (and yellow based, not red based) skin tones?





Any help is appreciated!
MAC vs Bare Minerals?
try lookin at their website or get samples
MAC vs Bare Minerals?
I like Mac studio fix much better, i have tried both.


Bare Minerals leaves a orangey tint in your face..and since your pale i think it will be a bit too much..stick with Mac..its less expensive and BETTER.
Reply:bare minerals is better b/c it%26#039;s acutually good for your skin and it is especiall y good for pale skin b/c there are lots of light tones available. and it has SPF which also really good for your skin.


So yes! you%26#039;re making a very wise choice!
Reply:bare minerals is seriously, the best thing ever. I stongly recommend switching and you will see the difference. They have shades for all skin tones and they blend so easily.





go here to find your shade:


http://www.sephora.com/brands/bare-escen...
Reply:Bare minerals is light, natural, makes your skin soft and has SPF. I love it, its great for me. If your looking for heavy coverage for bigger zits and whatever then stick with Mac it has better coverage.


bare mineral also doesn%26#039;t make your skin orange what-so-ever. It matches your skin tone perfectly you almost forget your wearing it. The person above obviously chose the wrong colour or doesn%26#039;t know how to apply it properly.
Reply:If you are used to MAC you won%26#039;t be satisfied with Bare Minerals performance. It does not have as good of coverage as MAC. There are so many shades of MAC compared to Bare Minerals 5 or so? You won%26#039;t get as exact of a match!